nod32 antivirus 9 license key  - Crack Key For U

This is the best software to protect your PC data and Windows files from the bad viruses. Eset Nod32 Antivirus 9 License Key also help you. This is the Official KMSpico Website that helps you to activate windows 10,11, 7, 8 and Microsoft office products free of cost, download KMS pico Activator. Eset NOD32 Antivirus 9 License Key This app ESET NOD32 Antivirus Serial Key provides you with the perfect balance of detection.

Nod32 antivirus 9 license key - Crack Key For U -

License key eset nod32 antivirus

Eset Nod32 Antivirus 14 license key free E-commerce Website.

license key eset nod32 antivirus

Eset Nod32 Internet Security 14 Serial Keys E-commerce Website. NOD32 Finder - Es. Briller kvinders synsam Company. NOD32 Serials. Software.

license key eset nod32 antivirus

ESET Nod32 Keys Interest. Eset Nod32 License Key. ESET NOD32 Antivirus will only receive updates once activated using your License Key. If you did not enter your License Key after installation, your product will not be activated.

license key eset nod32 antivirus

Oct 29, - ESET NOD32 Antivirus is the best protection you may find to fight. · ESET antivirus 9 is enough for me to protect my PC in $ Eset nod32 antivirus 9 username and password Fire emblem fates birthright rom. License Key Update ESET NOD32 Antivirus ESET Internet Security Serial Key Working AFAX-WKAED-B34B License. Oct 25, ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Crack valid till ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9: has been officially released by eset powered with windows 10 compatibility and lots of new features for maximum protection and security but once again team has developed a serial key for ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 which is valid till ESET Smart Security 9 License Key gets got the anticipated malware-signature fitting and heuristic behavior tracking to protect against malware infection but includes its own cloud-based Live Grid reputation track, which uses computer algorithms to spot malicious applications.

Additionally, it has unique tools to scan the critical hard disk’s Master Boot Record, which a couple of antivirus. ESET NOD32 Antivirus 10 License Key with Crack is the world most popular and reliable antivirus software.

This software offers extra protection to your computer from dangerous threats like virus, Trojan, adware, malware, rootkits etc. ESET NOD32 Antivirus 10 Crack most widely used antivirus program from all over the world. Many professional pc users personally like this software because it’s. · ESET NOD32 Antivirus and ESET Smart Security hotfix version has been released and is available to download. Changelog Fixed: Banking & Payment Protection issue when using number pad Support Resources To check the in-product upgrade for the latest version of your ESET product, see Ho.

ESET Nod32 Antivirus 12 License Key is built-in Cleaner help remove more challenging and stubborn infections, though we had been not able to test this at this time.

license key eset nod32 antivirus

ESET Nod32 Antivirus 12 License Key is a browser-agnostic and does not need an extension. You won’t get search results evaluations, but ESET successfully blocked us from trying to. ESET Nod32 Antivirus 10 License Key fastest solutions which are antivirus so quickly you will not even notice it running. And it’s both incredibly user-friendly yet easy to tailor to your needs that are certain. On our website, you can get free fresh keys for ESET NOD32 Internet Security v, 11, ESET NOD32 Smart Security v and v


Eset Nod32 Antivirus 6 Activation Key Lists



  • ********************

  • Eset Nod32 Antivirus 6 Activation Key Lists


  • (Copy & Paste link)

  • ********************














































  • Today we are going to introduce ESET NOD32 Antivirus License Key Free. ESET NOD32 Antivirus License Key is the world best antivirus software.. On our website, you can get free fresh keys for ESET NOD32 Internet Security v, 11, ESET NOD32 Smart Security v and v, the keys for ESET NOD32 Antivirus v.9 - 11 and v, and. Download ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 With License Key till , ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Keys, ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Activation Codes, NOD32 Antivirus 9 Patch


  • Eset Smart security 9 License key can easily remove the viruses from your computer Eset Smart security 9 License Key is one of the best and useful application for pc and mobiles.


  • ESET NOD32 Antivirus License Key . ESET NOD32 Antivirus License Key .. ESET Antivirus 11 Crack, ESET NOD32 Antivirus 11 Full Version, ESET NOD32 Antivirus 11 Serial Key valid till , ESET NOD32 Antivirus 11 Activation Codes, ESET Antivirus 11 Registration


  • ESET NOD32 Antivirus Activation Key is one of the best and most reliable and efficient anti-viruses on the market.


  • Introducing the new Firefox browser. 2x Faster, 30% less memory.. ESET Products Any Version Universal Licence Finder & Installer.. ESET NOD32 Antivirus License Keys Free Download from Copy Generated Serial Key & Paste To ESET License Activation Box. d4ecf59

  • Источник:

    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key Plus [Cracked/Patch] Download

    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key Plus [CrackedPatch] Download

    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key Download

    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key Plus [Cracked/Patch] Download is not just an antivirus but, Anti-Spyware, Anti-Theft, Anti rootkit, Antispam and many more in just one software. This ensures the comprehensive security and privacy of your usernames, passwords (eset nod32 antivirus 9 activation key ) and e- banking account in any circumstance. While, It encrypts all your passwords, usernames and credit card data to ensure your hard earned money is safe every time. While, It possesses an (eset nod32 antivirus 9 license key facebook) Anti- Theft Infographic that helps you to locate your laptop if it is missing in action.

    Because, Fast Antivirus Eset nod32 antivirus 9 license key   award-winning allows you to explore with confidence online. So, Eset nod32 antivirus 9 activation key features advanced new technology that protects against threats as well as browser and application exploits. So, The anti-phishing unit protects you from fake sites in an attempt to get your personal information.

    Another, The new social media scanner extends security to Facebook and Twitter by checking. Your (eset nod32 antivirus 9 activation key ) accounts for harmful content. Included cyber (eset smart security 9 license key free) security training teaches you tips and techniques to make your online experience safer through (eset nod32 antivirus 10 license key free download) a series of online learning modules. In addition, These Keys On This Post Are Regularly Updated So That Every User Can Activate Their Antivirus and Keep Him Safe From Virus Attacks. You Can Get Latest eset smart security 9 licence keyFrom Here.

    Download ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Cracked

    No doubt in the world of internet as antivirus eset nod32 antivirus 9 serial keys + tnod activator is the powerful pc utility tool. Finally, No one another offer as such protection to your computer from malicious threats and keeps your pc fully secure from harm. First of all, The main advantage of (eset nod32 antivirus 9 activation key crack) this software it offers protection to your pc either you are online or offline. And It doesn’t matter because this software works efficiently as backup and keep them fully secure.


    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key

    Download: Link

    Crack: Link

    Features ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key :

    • 1)&#;&#;&#;> Botnet Protection. Therefore,
    • 2)&#;&#;&#;> Antivirus. Therefore,
    • 3)&#;&#;&#;> Personal Firewall.
    • 4)&#;&#;&#;> Banking & Payment Protection.
    • 5)&#;&#;&#;> Antispyware.
    • 6)&#;&#;&#;> Anti-Theft. Much as,
    • 7)&#;&#;&#;> Advanced Memory Scanner.
    • 8)&#;&#;&#;> Parental Control. Either,
    • 9)&#;&#;&#;> Vulnerability Shield.
    • 10)&#;&#;&#;> Exploit Blocker.
    • 11)&#;&#;&#;> Anti-Phishing.
    • 12)&#;&#;&#;> Antispam.
    ESET NOD32 Antivirus 9 Serial Key
    • 1)&#;&#;&#;> afax-we8bf-f4nt-w3nk
    • 2)&#;&#;&#;> afax-weacs-stam-pn7x
    • 3)&#;&#;&#;> afax-werdgvs-aj28
    • 4)&#;&#;&#;> afax-wesjg-gwf7-xdvs

    valid: full keys. As a result,

    • 5)&#;&#;&#;> AUTU-XHG9-CSB3-G94U-EDPJ

    valid: As a result,. Therefore,. Most of all,

    • 6)&#;&#;&#;> Dwea-wvpck-kfvn8v

    valid: full key

    • 7)&#;&#;&#;> CNAXX-9AUT3U-K7EB
    • 8)&#;&#;&#;> CNDU-WKHDEV-8GA5
    • 9)&#;&#;&#;> CNAXW-WCD8-B8JB-TE2P
    • 10)&#;&#;&#;> CNDU-WKAHM-MSCT-6HNR
    • 11)&#;&#;&#;> CNDU-WKVTVT4-TT7G

    valid : /

    • 12)&#;&#;&#;> AFA2-XH33D-3DFD-M4FH
    • 13)&#;&#;&#;> A8AC-XS5F-VSCUDP-DFS6
    • 14)&#;&#;&#;> BN2R-XKDE-PARRCWS4



    KMSPico is the activator that is used to activate Microsoft Products, such as Windows and Office. It is a total virus and malware-free tool and trusted by many people.

    I personally use it for Windows activation. This amazing activator works without the internet, and it’s very easy to use.

    If you are not getting the premium feature of windows in free, then KMSpicois a handy tool for activating windows and enjoy these features for free with the help of this tool

    This Software developed by respected TeamDaz and also known as Windows 10 activator, they have also made other KMS tools like KMSAuto,Windows 7 loaderwhich work automatically they are going well for us

    So if anyone has a problem activating windows just follow this simple guide to learn how you can do it easily, also you will find the download link.

    What is KMSPico?

    KMSPico is used to validate the pirated version of Microsoft Windows and MS Offices. However, this KMS technology is introduced by Microsoft for mutual gain, without getting exposed by Microsoft.


    KMSPico is also the software of those technologies which doesn’t violate the rules of Microsoft. It’s just like a local server that lets every machine use KMS Technology.!

    It doesn’t only helps you in activating Windows OS it also helps you to activate the MS Office which is also a Microsoft product.

    You know that the new versions of MS office are required to be activated to use their full features. It comes with some days of trial. When the trial ends you need to activate it to use it again. That’s why this activator is also helpful for activating it.

    How KMSPico Works

    To understand the concept of KMSPico you first need to understand how KMS works. We are taking an example of Microsoft so that you can learn properly.

    As you know that Microsoft works with many small and big companies. So the people of those companies have the problem of verifying the windows or other products they are using.

    To solve this problem Microsoft assigns the Key Management Server (KMS). This way they don’t need to enter the Windows product key to activate their Windows. Instead, they go through the KMS server and this server activates their Microsoft products.

    This way Microsoft achieved an activation of the volume licensed products. So, now every company uses the KMS server instead of buying a separate copy of windows for every system.

    It also works on the same principle. It connects you to the KMS server and shows your windows that it is a part of the KMS server.

    Download KMSpico

    What KMS Pico Does


    When you buy a copy of a Windows or Microsoft products you will get the trial version of that product. Some of them consist of keys otherwise they came in the trial versions.

    Trial versions are limited to almost 30 days. When the trial expires you will have to activate the product to use it more.

    When the trial expires you can’t use some features of Windows or MS Office. In this case, you need to have an activator so that you can use that product for a lifetime.

    KMS Pico is an example of such software that helps you to activate Microsoft products so that you can use it for the rest of your life for free.

    There are many other tools that are available on the internet which gives their users a guarantee that they will activate it. But most of those activators have trojans and malware that damage your machine.


    This is the best activator because it not only activates Windows but also activates Office as well. Here is the list of all the products which Activator Supports:

    • Windows 10
    • Windows
    • Windows 8
    • Windows
    • Windows Vista
    • MS Office 
    • Office
    • Office
    • Office
    • Office

    We will keep updating it if we found another supported product or found any new information about the activator.

    Download KMSpico

    Downloading KMSPico is not a big deal. I am providing you with a direct link from where you can download easily without facing any issue.

    Download KMSpico

    Let’s now look at the steps of how to download.

    • First of all click on the download button Above.
    • Then you will be redirected to our download page.
    • There you can see a download button available.
    • Click on that download button and wait for a few seconds.
    • Now it will ask you where you want to save it. Choose your desired location and click on download now.
    •  It will take a few minutes to download. (Depends on your internet speed).
    • You will get a zip file, extract that file and it will ask you for a password.
    • You can find the password on the download page

    That’s all now you have successfully downloaded it on your computer. Now if you don’t know how to install and activate your windows you can follow my Installation guide.


    As you read all the above information about the tool now here is a full guide on How you can download and install the windows activator.

    Follow these steps so that you can also enjoy the fully activated windows and ms office for a lifetime. This is very easy to install and use an activator.

    First of all, you need to turn off the firewall and Antivirus (Don’t worry it’s not a trojan or any virus. Antivirus blocks it because they know this will activate the windows


    If you are using windows 10 then follow these steps to pause the Virus Protection.

    Search for the Protection and open Virus & Threat Protection


    Now click on Virus & Threat Protection Settings.


    And then turn off Real-Time Protection.


    After the above steps now Download KMSPico From our website.

    • If you find any link is broken or unavailable Inform us so that we can update it as soon as possible. Also, you just go for another link.
    • Once your download is completed just install it like other software.
    • When your installation is completed just go to the installation directory. (You will find the directory in C/ProgramFiles/KMSPico (x84 or x32) C/ProgramFiles(x84)/KMSPico (x64).
    • Now look for the and double click on it to open.
    • Run it anyway if it asks for the administration privilege.! (See the screenshot).


    Now a newwindow will pop up and you will see a red button.


    Just click on that redbutton and it will take only a few seconds to complete activation. When it completes you will hear a voice saying ProgramComplete!


    That’s it, now you have activated the windows Successfully.

    To activate the MS Office you first need to open any of their programs just like Microsoft Excel or Word. Then just follow those above steps to activate it. When it’s completed just restart your machine and check out if your windows are activated or not.

    To Check your activation just simply right-click on My Computer and then go to Properties.


    Now you will use all the features of Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office lifetime.

    How to Activate Windows 10

    Key Characteristic

    It helps you in activating the windows as well as office products. With the help of this tool, you can enjoy the activated Microsoft products for the rest of your life without purchasing it.

    Also, it automatically activates the windows when you update it. You don’t need to follow again those steps for that.

    This tool is a free lifetime. You can use it to use all the paid features of ms office and windows totally free. This is a lifetime free solution for Windows and Office.

    The developer of KMSPico develops it in such a way that it will never be caught with any antivirus or any other thing. You can use it on many machines as you want.

    This tool creates a new server on your machine so that it can activate the windows and office products according to that server.

    This tool not only supports the 32 bit or 64 bit. But this works on both x32 and x62 as well.

    You don’t need any type of training or huge knowledge of programs to run this tool. This is a simple and easy to use tool. It just requires a few steps to activate windows.

    This is a free tool and it will remain free for a lifetime. You can use this tool anytime and anywhere without paying it.

    This Activator is best to Activate Windows 10 Free Without paying anyone to get keys.


    This tool has many features it is very easy to use. It has a good user-friendly UI, anyone can understand it within a few seconds.

    It saves your money and time, with the help of this you can activate Microsoft Office and Microsoft windows freely without paying money.

    Read the list below to learn more about these features:

    • This tool helps you to activate the different versions of Microsoft Office (from to also ). Either is the x84 bit or x64 bit. This tool automatically detects the version of a product.
    • It is totally free and also it is a virus and malware-protected tool.
    • You don’t need to have an internet connection to use this activator. It is a fully standalone (Offline) tool.
    • This tool provides you with real and genuine activation. You don’t need to worry about being caught
    • It also supports multiples languages.
    • It requires to Framework or above version to work it properly.

    Pros and Cons

    There are many benefits that KMSPico provides you from other activators. Here are some key points about this tool you can compare it with other activators if you want.

    1. It occupies less space in your PC. KMSPico occupies only 5MB on your computer.
    2. It accesses the public system
    3. It is a virus and malware-free tool.
    4. It is safe and easy to use. This tool doesn’t collect your personal data.
    5. This supports multiple languages. It is good for others who are not English speakers.
    6. It is a free tool that can be used for a lifetime. It won’t cost you even a penny.

    When it comes to the Cons of this tool, We can’t find anything about this. Because it is a free and malware-free tool. What else we need?

    How To Remove KMS Pico From Computer

    This is a simple guide that also helps you to uninstall it from your computer.

    Just follow these steps to learn how it works.

    1. Uninstall it using the “Add/Remove Program”.
    2. Deleting the KMSPico from the Google Chrome and Firefox
    3. By Removing Registry files permanently.

    Here is a detailed guide about Uninstall KMSPico Completely Read it carefully so that you avoid making mistakes. if you don’t understand any step just contact us by filling the contact us form. We will help you in uninstalling it.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    As we all know that it is a type of illegal tool because piracy of any software is illegal. That’s why many people ask questions before they try to install it.

    Here are some frequently asked questions which everyone wants to know. Just read this FAQ and if you have any other just ask it in the comments or by contacting us.

    We will also add it here if we find it useful for others. 🙂

    Which is the official website of KMSpico?

    There are several websites available that provide KMSPico to the visitors but none of them is official. However, there is only one official kmspico website is where you get % virus-free tools for Windows & Office.

    Is KMS Activator Safe?

    Yes, KMSPico is % safe and secure to use, although many other websites are out there that provide it as well. But the problem is none of them is legit which means you may download a virus or trojan instead of the real KMSPico tool.

    Can I Delete KMSpico After Activation?

    Yes, KMSPico can be deleted after the installation as it is only used to install the KMS server on your computer. Once the server is set up you can then remove it and your activation will still remain, and it automatically generates a new license in days.

    It shows Windows is activated but I still see that watermark saying “Your Windows is not Genuine”?

    In case you follow all the steps to activate Microsoft Windows using KMSPico but still, you see Windows is not Genuine then simply restart your computer. After restart follows all the steps again and then once all steps complete restart your machine again and Voila the message disappears.

    Is it permanent or my windows will automatically deactivate after some time?

    KMSPico uses the Key Management Technology in which your computer requires you to get a new license every days. So, once you activate your product use this tool you won’t need to follow all the steps again just make sure to connect to the internet at least once in days to get a new license.

    Do I need an Internet connection to Run it?

    Yes, an internet connection is required in the case to install a KMS server on your computer. This works offline too but the problem is your license will be expired within months. To make it permanent just make sure to connect with the internet and then activate any product using KMSPico.


    As you read everything about the This KMSpico Activator, it features its installation program, activating windows and office, and many other things.

    But if you still have some questions please feel free to ask. You can ask us by filling the Contact Us form or through an email. even in the comments. We will reply to you as soon as we can.

    If you like my work then share it with your friends as well. Also, add this website to your bookmark tab to reach us fast and stay updated. We keep posting the newer version if we found any.

    This is everything about the KMSPico Windows 10 and MS Office Activator. If you have any further questions just contact us or comment below.


    eset nod32 Antivirus license key + Full Crack lifetime

    Eset nod32 antivirus license key + Full Crack lifetime

    eset nod32 Antivirus license key + Full Crack lifetime

    ESET NOD32 Crack is the most powerful protection you can find to combat today&#;s vast numbers of Internet and email threats. It provides proper antispyware protection without affecting your computer&#;s performance. Also, it defends your computer from the new attacks that make your PC performance is excellent and run very fast. It protects from both known and unknown viruses, Trojans, worms, adware, spyware, rootkits, and other threats. It&#;ll give you the full protection you can enjoy a safe internet. It reinforces its cutting-edge protection with a Script-Based Attack Protection.

    Once the user installed this fantastic antivirus then no worry about slowdowns of your computer performance. With eset nod32 antivirus license key, you can easily enjoy gaming at high speed. This antivirus includes special game mode which grants full access to the game and makes your games very fast.

    ESET NOD32 Full Crack Free License Keygen [Windows + Mac]

    It&#;s effortless to use and manage, gives you a detailed setting that helpful for the users. Day by day ESET protection technology proves it a good antivirus, hence its work from the last 20 years. ESET NOD32antivirus crack provides you full access, and even users needs in the local language then ESET NOD32 Antivirus Crack gives you. This antivirus in multi-language, no worry about how to understand. NOD32 Antivirus is also one of the fastest antivirus software, so much fast you won&#;t even notice it running.

    ESET NOD32 License Key Download:

    Indeed, ESET NOD32 13 Key multi-language, no tension about ways to comprehend. ESET Nod32 Antivirus Serial Key is among the lightweight antivirus software, so much lightweight you won&#;t even detect it&#;s running. Additionally, it offers loads of software packages to secure Android and Mac — although multi-device protection can soon accumulate. ESET provides reliable security and is simple to use. However, the useful features like a VPN and file shredder which come standard with other antivirus packages brands.

    ESET NOD32 Crack Latest:

    An antivirus that&#;s virtually indisputable in security applications, it&#;s among the most dependable and efficient antiviruses around the globe. ESET Nod32 13 Crack is an intriguing alternative to other high-performance antivirus tools, for example, Kaspersky and Norton. Its detection technique of risks is based upon detecting and removing dangerous and unknown behaviors. So, the database of virus definitions is updated every single day. Regarding removing detected threats, it&#;s famous for its efficacy, but the process takes more time than what&#;s generally seen in different antivirus applications. Another drawback is the lack of further features that frustrates new users.

    eset nod32 Antivirus license key + Full Crack lifetime

    Features of ESET Crack + Latest Version:

    • Protection from the known and Unknown
    • Finds Malware from hidden files
    • Stay safe from viruses and trojans
    • Built to manage speed
    • Therefore stop hackers from accessing your system
    • Some viruses may prevent antivirus, but ESET NOD32 Crack may also fight from its shortcuts.
    • Also, A hacker becomes added to your device simple to protect all of your applications on your computer.
    • More, Love the router with the help of a webcam and a home-safe Individual.
    • Nod32 Keys can provide you with cloud lightning-fast scanning to the best of the best security.
    • Block all the ads for pleasure in surfing the internet.
    • It supplies a top slope against ransomware.
    • It&#;s capable of scanning your system at a more profound level.
    • Also, it provides you with the very best cutting edge botnet protection.
    • It finds tens of malware types.
    • Halt the layout designed to spare you.
    • Love free assistance from the expert user
    • Also, It&#;s improved prevention.
    • Bank and safely buy online
    • Stay protected from viruses and trojans
    • Leading and anonymous protection
    • Also, Safe webcam and home modem
    • Locate Malware from hidden documents
    • Also, Save Your own Android and Pills
    • Shield all your apparatus
    • Made to Control rate
    • Also, Easy in your personal computer
    • Easy on Your computer
    • Protect all of your devices
    • Safer webcam and house router
    • Enjoy free support from the pro user
    • Secure your Android and tablets
    • Bank and shop online with safely

    What&#;s New?

    • Blocks attack that specially designed to evade antivirus detection, which is harmful to the computer.
    • It detects thousands of related malware variants, including new or previously known
    • Detects malicious JavaScripts that can attack via your browser and attacks by malicious scripts that try to exploit Windows.
    • It also Fixes internal bugs.
    • Also, The advanced analysis support that there is new spy-related protection from great flags and risks.
    • The cube attempts to find assistance from the bugs, titles, or passwords which are sensitive to the lender and credit card info by websites.
    • So, ESET NOD32 Keys gives more power to applications that you use everyday and boost the hardware era.
    • Also, the device will personalize the device information pattern. Deciding the directions to get the device registry,
    • Furthermore, the applications, and Working techniques, and repairing your safe ways.
    • Also, Avoid personal copying information is untrue.
    • ESET NOD32 Crack removes all kinds of risks, such as Malware, rootkits, and infected documents.
    • Cloud robust scanning is real-time against online threats and the manipulation of private data.
    • Also, ESET NOD32 License Key Protects the browsers and other software conscious of the dangers which may happen in these programs.
    • System Requirements:
    • Operating System: Windows / XP / Vista / Windows 7 / Windows 8 / Windows 10 / Windows 10
    • CPU: Processor 2 GHz Dual Core AMD
    • RAM: 2 GB
    • Storage: Hard Disk MB
    • Languages: Multiple languages

    NOD32 Keys





    ESET NOD32 12 License Key





    ESET NOD32 License Key





    ESET NOD32 License Key





    ESET NOD32 License Key





    ESET NOD32 License Key




    How To Crack?

    1. First, download and install the application from the official site.
    2. Download &#;ESET NOD32 AntiVirus Keygen&#;
    3. After Install Run it
    4. Choose platform & Click on Generate Password.
    5. Finally, That&#;s all.
    6. Enjoy ESET NOD32 AntiVirus Free.


    • Excellent interface
    • Easy on system resources
    • Scans incoming Mails
    • Import and Export Configurations
    • Very effective


    activation key free

    license key free

    Filed Under: Antivirus



    Multilingual free online encyclopedia

    This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

    Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of ,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

    Wikipedia was launched on January 15, , by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2&#;billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (&#;edits per second).[10][11] In , Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

    Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late s and early s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In , Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]


    Main article: History of Wikipedia


    Main article: Nupedia

    Logo reading " the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
    Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

    Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, , under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, , Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

    Launch and early growth

    The (later redirecting to and were registered on January 12, ,[26] and January 13, ,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, [19] as a single English-language edition at,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

    The Wikipedia home page on December 20,

    English Wikipedia editors with > edits per month[31]

    Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of by the end of [33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in , and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, , making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in , which had held the record for almost &#;years.[34]

    Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February [35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from to[36][37]

    Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August , the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early [38] Around 1, articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in ; by that average was roughly [39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

    In November , a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49, editors during the first three months of ; in comparison, it lost only 4, editors during the same period in [44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in , denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in , he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36, writers" in June to 35, in June In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since , Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July , The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, , issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]


    Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January&#;[update]One square represents 10, articles. Languages with fewer than 10, articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

    In January , Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With &#;million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January , when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around &#;million unique visitors.[52] As of March&#;[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In , it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, , The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18&#;billion page views and nearly &#;million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

    On January 18, , the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than &#;million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

    On January 20, , Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December and December Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December , Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

    In January , Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October , Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July , of the 7, page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April , an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June , scientists reported that all 16&#;GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

    Current state

    On January 23, , the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

    By February , Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

    Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]


    Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

    Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]


    Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

    In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

    Wikipedia's editing interface

    Review of changes

    Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

    In , economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]


    Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

    Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

    Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

    In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May , falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

    In , Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

    Edit warring

    Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

    Policies and laws

    Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

    Content policies and guidelines

    According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[]


    Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

    Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[][] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[]


    Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[][] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[][]

    By , fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[]

    Dispute resolution

    Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

    Arbitration Committee

    Main article: Arbitration Committee

    The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[]

    Main article: Wikipedia community

    Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[]

    Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[]

    Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[]

    Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community&#; a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[] In , a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[]

    The English Wikipedia has 6,, articles, 42,, registered editors, and , active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

    Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.


    A study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia&#; are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[] Jimmy Wales stated in that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users&#; people&#; And in fact, the most active 2%, which is people, have done % of all the edits."[] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[]

    A study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[][] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[] According to a study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[]


    Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[]

    Language editions

    Main article: List of Wikipedias

    Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January
    Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
    Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

    There are currently language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November , the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of [update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

    In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over , articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over ,, and 82 more have over 10,[][] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over million articles. As of January&#;,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[]

    1 3

    English 6,,

    Cebuano 6,,

    Swedish 2,,

    German 2,,

    French 2,,

    Dutch 2,,

    Russian 1,,

    Spanish 1,,

    Italian 1,,

    Polish 1,,

    Egyptian Arabic 1,,

    Japanese 1,,

    Vietnamese 1,,

    Waray 1,,

    Chinese 1,,

    Arabic 1,,

    Ukrainian 1,,

    Portuguese 1,,

    Persian ,

    Catalan ,

    The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

    Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[] or points of view.[]

    Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[][][]

    Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

    Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[]

    Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

    A study published by PLOS One in also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[]

    English Wikipedia editor numbers

    Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

    On March 1, , The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42, editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2, editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in at approximately 50, and dropping to 30, by the start of

    In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,[] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[]


    See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

    Ambox current red

    This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March )

    Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly , words as of [update][][]

    Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In , columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[][][]

    Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in and respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[][] A article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[]

    In , Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[]

    In , the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[]

    Accuracy of content

    Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

    Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[] However, a peer review in of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[] Others raised similar critiques.[] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[][] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4&#;× 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[]

    As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[] Concerns have been raised by PC World in regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[] the insertion of false information,[]vandalism, and similar problems.

    Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[]

    Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[]

    Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, ], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[][][][][] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[]

    A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[]

    Discouragement in education

    Ambox current red

    This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December )

    Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[] Wales once ( or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[]

    In February , an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[] In June , former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

    In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[]

    Medical information

    See also: Health information on Wikipedia

    On March 5, , Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[] In a May 7, , follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[]

    Quality of writing

    Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

    In a mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[]

    In , researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization&#; his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice&#; and&#; his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians&#; remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[]

    Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[]

    Coverage of topics and systemic bias

    See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia §&#;Systemic bias in coverage

    Ambox current red

    Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March )

    Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[][] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in , Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[] and Pakistan,[] amongst other countries.

    A study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July to January ) in each field:[]

    • Culture and Arts: 30% (%)
    • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
    • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
    • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
    • History and events: 11% (%)
    • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (%)
    • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
    • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
    • Health: 2% (42%)
    • Mathematics and logic: 1% (%)
    • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (%)

    These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[]

    A study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[]

    Coverage of topics and selection bias

    Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[]

    An editorial in The Guardian in claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[]

    Systemic biases

    When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In , Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, , essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

    Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[]

    Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in , studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[][] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[]

    Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[][]

    Explicit content

    See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

    "Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

    Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

    The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

    The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December , access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[]

    In April , Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[][] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of [] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since have reappeared.[]


    One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

    In January , a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, , the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[]

    Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[]


    Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

    Wikipedia was described in as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[][]

    The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[]

    Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[]

    A comprehensive survey, published in , found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[]


    Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

    Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

    Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[] The foundation's IRS Form shows revenue of $&#;million and expenses of almost $29&#;million, with assets of $&#;million and liabilities of about $&#;million.[]

    In May , Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, , that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[][] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency&#; We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[]

    Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June [] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority&#; (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[]

    Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

    Software operations and support

    See also: MediaWiki

    The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

    Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

    In April , a Lucene extension[][] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[]

    In July , after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[][][][] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

    Automated editing

    Main article: Wikipedia bots

    Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[][][] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10, articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[]

    According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[]

    Hardware operations and support

    See also: Wikimedia Foundation §&#;Hardware

    Wikipedia receives between 25, and 60,page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[][needs update] As of ,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish


    ESET nod32 keys

    days free trial keys

    ESET NOD32 Internet Security
    ESET NOD32 Smart Security
    ESET NOD32 Antivirus
    ESET Mobile Security

    On our website, you can get free keys for ESET NOD32 Internet Security, ESET NOD32 Smart Security the keys for ESET NOD32 Antivirus and , and new activation keys for ESET Mobile Security.

    Published keys are TRIAL and have a validity period of 30 days.

    Old activation keys for ver. have the format Username and Password. The new activation key has the format XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX and consists of 5 blocks of 4 symbols. By new activation key you can also activate older versions of ESET anti-virus software. To activate the old () version by new activation key, just select the appropriate type of activation:

    Keys for ESET NOD32 distributed for free for personal use only!
    At the end of the trial period, it is recommended to purchase a license online ESET NOD

    Convert Username / Password to the activation key for version (XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX)

    nod32 antivirus 9 license key  - Crack Key For U

    Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/ on line 136

    Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/ on line 136

    1 Replies to “Nod32 antivirus 9 license key - Crack Key For U”

    1. В @Mohd Razif RomliВ  oh ye, btw awak pakai hardisk model apa? Saya guna Seagate..

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *